Russia

Novosibirsk CHP-3 — 512 MW Coal

Coal Verified

Novosibirsk CHP-3 is a 512 MW coal power plant located in Russia. View location, capacity, and technical details.

Capacity
512 MW

Installed

Commissioned
1975

Year online

Owner
JSC "Sibeco"

Operator

Location
55.01, 82.85

Coordinates

Insights

#152
largest in Russia
#1,565
largest Coal worldwide
#4,541
largest worldwide
1975
22 yrs older than avg
5
operated by JSC "Sibeco"
8
plants within 100 km

Technical Details

Fuel Type
Coal
Capacity
512 MW
Commissioned
1975
Status
Operational
Owner
JSC "Sibeco"
Country
Russia
Coordinates
55.008, 82.854

Carbon Footprint

Annual CO₂
2,020,814 t

tonnes / year

Lifetime CO₂
80,832,550 t

over ~40 yrs

Intensity
820 g

Est. gCO2/kWh

Annual emissions equivalent to

439,307
cars per year
269,442
homes per year
91,855,170
trees to offset

Indicative estimate from standard life-cycle emission and capacity factors — not a measured figure. Open calculator

Nearby Plants

About this plant

Novosibirsk Combined Heat and Power Plant No. 3 (CHP-3) is a significant power generation facility located in Novosibirsk, Russia. With a total capacity of 511.5 megawatts (MW), this power plant plays a critical role in the energy sector of the Siberian region and the country as a whole. Owned by JSC “Sibeco,” Novosibirsk CHP-3 primarily utilizes coal as its fuel source. This choice of fuel aligns with the region’s abundant coal reserves, which contribute to the plant’s operational efficiency and energy reliability.

As a coal-fired power plant, Novosibirsk CHP-3 is equipped with technology designed to convert the thermal energy from burning coal into electricity. The combustion process generates steam, which drives turbines to produce electricity. The plant is also involved in combined heat and power (CHP) production, meaning it generates both electricity and useful thermal energy for district heating. This dual-output capability enhances overall energy efficiency, allowing the facility to provide heating to local residential and industrial consumers in addition to generating electricity.

In the context of Russia’s energy sector, Novosibirsk CHP-3 is an integral component of the national grid, particularly in supporting the energy needs of Siberia. As one of the largest power producers in the region, it helps maintain grid stability and supply, especially during peak demand periods in the harsh Siberian winters. The plant’s capacity contributes significantly to the local energy mix, ensuring that both urban and rural areas have access to reliable power sources.

However, the reliance on coal as a primary fuel source presents environmental challenges. Coal combustion is associated with greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), as well as other pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). These emissions can contribute to air quality issues and climate change, making the environmental impact of coal-fired power plants a critical concern. In response to these challenges, there is ongoing discourse in Russia regarding the transition to cleaner energy sources and the implementation of technologies aimed at reducing emissions from coal power generation.

Regionally, Novosibirsk CHP-3 holds significance beyond just power production. It supports the local economy by providing jobs and contributing to the energy infrastructure necessary for industrial development. The availability of reliable electricity and heat is crucial for various sectors, including manufacturing and services, which rely on steady power supplies for operations. As such, the plant helps facilitate economic growth and stability in Novosibirsk and the surrounding areas.

In conclusion, Novosibirsk CHP-3 stands as a pivotal power generation facility in Russia, exemplifying the challenges and benefits of coal-fired energy production. While it plays a vital role in ensuring energy reliability and economic support for the region, it also highlights the need for a balanced approach to energy generation that considers both current demands and future sustainability.

More Coal plants

Spotted an error?

Our data is community-verified. If any detail looks wrong or out of date, suggest a correction below — our team reviews and applies approved changes across all languages.