United States

Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant — 1,242 MW Nuclear

Nuclear Verified

Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant is a 1,242 MW nuclear power plant located in United States of America. View location, capacity, and technical details.

Capacity
1,242 MW

Installed

Commissioned
1990

Year online

Owner
NextEra Energy Resources

Operator

Location
42.90, -70.85

Coordinates

Insights

#273
largest in United States of America
#290
largest Nuclear worldwide
#1,788
largest worldwide
1990
2 yrs newer than avg
6
operated by NextEra Energy Resources
205
plants within 100 km

Technical Details

Fuel Type
Nuclear
Capacity
1,242 MW
Commissioned
1990
Status
Operational
Owner
NextEra Energy Resources
Country
United States
Coordinates
42.899, -70.851
Wikipedia
Link

Carbon Footprint

Annual CO₂
110,975 t

tonnes / year

Lifetime CO₂
5,548,759 t

over ~50 yrs

Intensity
12 g

Est. gCO2/kWh

Annual emissions equivalent to

24,125
cars per year
14,797
homes per year
5,044,327
trees to offset

Indicative estimate from standard life-cycle emission and capacity factors — not a measured figure. Open calculator

Nearby Plants

About this plant

The Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant, located in Seabrook, New Hampshire, is a prominent facility in the United States energy sector, with a generating capacity of 1,242 megawatts (MW). Owned by NextEra Energy Resources, this nuclear power plant plays a vital role in providing a stable and reliable source of electricity to the New England region. Commissioned in 1990, Seabrook Station is designed to operate with pressurized water reactor (PWR) technology, a common type of nuclear reactor that utilizes uranium fuel to generate heat through nuclear fission. The heat produced in the reactor core is used to produce steam, which drives turbines to generate electricity, contributing significantly to the electricity grid and helping to meet the energy demands of millions of households and businesses.

As a nuclear power plant, Seabrook Station primarily uses enriched uranium as fuel. Uranium-235, the fissile isotope, is enriched to increase its concentration, allowing for a more efficient and sustained nuclear reaction. The plant’s design incorporates advanced safety features and systems to ensure the protection of both the public and the environment. The use of nuclear power is particularly significant in the context of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, as nuclear energy produces minimal air pollutants compared to fossil fuels. As such, Seabrook Station represents an essential component of the United States’ strategy to diversify its energy portfolio and reduce reliance on carbon-intensive energy sources.

The environmental impact of Seabrook Station is multifaceted. While nuclear energy is often lauded for its low emissions, the plant does produce radioactive waste, which must be managed and stored securely to prevent contamination. The spent nuclear fuel is currently stored on-site in specially designed pools and dry cask storage systems, pending the development of a long-term disposal solution. Additionally, the facility’s operations rely on large volumes of water from the Atlantic Ocean for cooling purposes, which raises concerns about thermal pollution and its effects on local marine ecosystems. Despite these challenges, the plant is subject to strict regulatory oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), ensuring that safety and environmental standards are maintained.

Regionally, Seabrook Station is significant not only for its contribution to the energy supply but also for its economic impact. It provides jobs for hundreds of employees and stimulates the local economy through various contracts and services. Furthermore, as part of the broader New England energy market, Seabrook Station plays a crucial role in maintaining grid reliability, especially during peak demand periods. In summary, the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant stands as a critical infrastructure asset in the United States, contributing to energy security, economic stability, and environmental stewardship while navigating the complexities associated with nuclear energy production.

More Nuclear plants

Spotted an error?

Our data is community-verified. If any detail looks wrong or out of date, suggest a correction below — our team reviews and applies approved changes across all languages.