United States

Thomas C Ferguson — 575 MW Natural Gas

Natural Gas Verified

Thomas C Ferguson is a 575 MW gas power plant located in United States of America. View location, capacity, and technical details.

Capacity
575 MW

Installed

Commissioned
2013

Year online

Owner
Lower Colorado River Authority

Operator

Location
30.56, -98.37

Coordinates

Insights

#776
largest in United States of America
#1,476
largest Natural Gas worldwide
#4,275
largest worldwide
2013
14 yrs newer than avg
11
operated by Lower Colorado River…
23
plants within 100 km

Technical Details

Fuel Type
Natural Gas
Capacity
575 MW
Commissioned
2013
Status
Operational
Owner
Lower Colorado River Authority
Country
United States
Coordinates
30.558, -98.371

Carbon Footprint

Annual CO₂
1,109,886 t

tonnes / year

Lifetime CO₂
33,296,576 t

over ~30 yrs

Intensity
490 g

Est. gCO2/kWh

Annual emissions equivalent to

241,280
cars per year
147,985
homes per year
50,449,358
trees to offset

Indicative estimate from standard life-cycle emission and capacity factors — not a measured figure. Open calculator

Nearby Plants

About this plant

The Thomas C Ferguson Power Plant, located in the United States, is a significant natural gas-fired power generation facility with a total capacity of 574.6 megawatts (MW). Commissioned in 2013, the plant plays a pivotal role in the energy sector of the country, particularly in providing reliable and efficient electricity to meet the demands of its surrounding regions. Owned by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), the facility is strategically positioned to support the grid and enhance energy security in the area it serves.

Natural gas, the primary fuel source for the Thomas C Ferguson Power Plant, is known for its relatively lower emissions compared to other fossil fuels like coal and oil. The combustion of natural gas produces significantly less carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter, making it a more environmentally friendly option for power generation. The plant utilizes advanced combustion technology designed to maximize efficiency and reduce environmental impact, aligning with modern standards for cleaner energy production. As the U.S. continues to transition towards a more sustainable energy landscape, facilities like Ferguson contribute to this shift by providing a cleaner alternative while still ensuring a stable energy supply.

The environmental impact of the Thomas C Ferguson Power Plant is a critical aspect of its operation. While natural gas plants emit fewer pollutants, the extraction and transportation of natural gas can pose environmental challenges, including methane leaks and the impact of hydraulic fracturing on local ecosystems. However, the plant’s design incorporates measures to mitigate these impacts, emphasizing the importance of adhering to environmental regulations and standards. Its operation is subject to strict oversight to ensure compliance with state and federal environmental laws, making it a responsible player in the energy market.

Regionally, the Thomas C Ferguson Power Plant serves as an essential component of the energy infrastructure in Texas and the broader southwestern United States. Its capacity to generate 574.6 MW places it among the reliable sources of electricity for both residential and commercial consumers. The plant supports the Lower Colorado River Authority’s mission to provide affordable and sustainable power, thereby contributing to economic stability and growth in the region. As demand for energy continues to rise, especially during peak usage periods, the Ferguson plant’s role becomes increasingly vital in meeting the energy needs of the local population and industries.

In conclusion, the Thomas C Ferguson Power Plant exemplifies the modern approach to energy production in the United States, balancing the need for reliable electricity generation with the imperative to reduce environmental impacts. Its reliance on natural gas positions it as a key player in the nation’s energy transition, ensuring that the region’s power supply remains resilient and sustainable for years to come.

More Natural Gas plants

Spotted an error?

Our data is community-verified. If any detail looks wrong or out of date, suggest a correction below — our team reviews and applies approved changes across all languages.