Fort Churchill is a 230 MW gas power plant located in United States of America. View location, capacity, and technical details.
Installed
Year online
Operator
Coordinates
Insights
Location
Technical Details
- Fuel Type
- Natural Gas
- Capacity
- 230 MW
- Commissioned
- 1969
- Status
- Operational
- Owner
- Sierra Pacific Power Co
- Country
- United States
- Coordinates
- 39.128, -119.132
Estimated Carbon Footprint
tonnes / year
over ~30 yrs
gCO₂ per kWh
Annual emissions equal to
Indicative estimate from standard life-cycle emission and capacity factors — not a measured figure. Open calculator
Nearby Stations
Tracy
United States of America · Natural Gas
Frank A. Tracy Generating Station
United States of America · Natural Gas
New Melones
United States of America · Hydroelectric
Collierville Powerhouse
United States of America · Hydroelectric
Don Pedro
United States of America · Hydroelectric
Jaybird
United States of America · Hydroelectric
About this plant
Ranking as the 1268th largest power generation facility in the United States, Fort Churchill holds a unique position in the national energy landscape. With a capacity of 230 MW, this gas-fired power plant, operated by Sierra Pacific Power Co, contributes a modest 0.02% to the national capacity of 1,386,385 MW. Commissioned in 1969, Fort Churchill exemplifies the enduring reliance on gas as a primary fuel source in the U.S., which is reflected in the fact that gas accounts for the majority of the country’s energy production. Positioned within close proximity to several other substantial power generation facilities, Fort Churchill is part of a robust energy cluster. Notable nearby plants include the Tracy plant and Frank A. Tracy Generating Station, each boasting a significant capacity of 1032.9 MW, as well as the Western 102 Power Plant with a capacity of 118.6 MW. The presence of these larger gas facilities underscores Fort Churchill’s role in supporting regional energy needs. Moreover, the nearby Soda Lake geothermal plants, with capacities of 26 MW and 21 MW respectively, introduce a diverse mix of energy generation in the vicinity, showcasing the versatility of the local grid. Despite its smaller capacity compared to its neighbors, Fort Churchill remains an essential contributor to the local energy supply. As the United States continues to seek a balance between renewable energy and fossil fuels, plants like Fort Churchill will play a vital role in maintaining grid stability. Looking forward, the facility’s operational longevity and adaptability will be crucial in the ongoing transition toward a more sustainable energy future.
More Natural Gas plants
Spotted an error?
Our data is community-verified. If any detail looks wrong or out of date, suggest a correction below — our team reviews and applies approved changes across all languages.