United States

George Neal North — 584 MW Coal

Coal Verified

George Neal North is a 584 MW coal power plant located in United States of America. View location, capacity, and technical details.

Capacity
584 MW

Installed

Commissioned
1975

Year online

Owner
MidAmerican Energy Co

Operator

Location
42.30, -96.36

Coordinates

Insights

#765
largest in United States of America
#1,518
largest Coal worldwide
#4,242
largest worldwide
1975
22 yrs older than avg
45
operated by MidAmerican Energy Co
20
plants within 100 km

Technical Details

Fuel Type
Coal
Capacity
584 MW
Commissioned
1975
Status
Operational
Owner
MidAmerican Energy Co
Country
United States
Coordinates
42.300, -96.362

Estimated Carbon Footprint

Annual CO₂
2,307,639 t

tonnes / year

Lifetime CO₂
92,305,557 t

over ~40 yrs

Intensity
820 g

gCO₂ per kWh

Annual emissions equal to

501,661
cars / year
307,685
homes / year
104,892,678
trees to offset

Indicative estimate from standard life-cycle emission and capacity factors — not a measured figure. Open calculator

Nearby Stations

About this plant

The George Neal North Power Plant, located in the United States of America, is a significant coal-fired power facility with a generation capacity of 584.1 megawatts (MW). Commissioned in 1975, this power plant is owned and operated by MidAmerican Energy Company, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy. The plant plays a crucial role in the regional energy landscape, contributing to the electricity supply for various sectors, including residential, commercial, and industrial consumers.

As a coal-fired power plant, George Neal North utilizes coal as its primary fuel source. Coal is a fossil fuel that is mined from the earth and is known for its high carbon content, which allows for substantial energy production when combusted. The plant employs traditional coal combustion technology to convert the chemical energy stored in coal into thermal energy, which is then transformed into electrical energy through steam generation and turbine operation. This process is integral to maintaining a stable and reliable energy supply, particularly during peak demand periods.

Despite its role in energy production, coal-fired power plants like George Neal North are often scrutinized for their environmental impact. The combustion of coal releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Additionally, coal combustion emits other pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter, which can lead to air quality issues and health concerns for nearby communities. In response to environmental regulations and public concern, many coal plants, including George Neal North, have implemented technologies to reduce emissions, such as scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators, which help minimize the release of harmful substances into the atmosphere.

Regionally, the George Neal North Power Plant is significant for its contribution to energy security and economic stability. Located in a region where coal is abundantly available, the plant supports local economies through job creation and the procurement of coal from nearby mines. Furthermore, it helps stabilize electricity prices in the Midwest by providing a consistent baseload power supply, which is essential for meeting the energy needs of a growing population and industrial sector.

In recent years, the energy sector in the United States has been undergoing a transition towards renewable energy sources, driven by technological advancements and climate policy initiatives. However, coal-fired power plants like George Neal North continue to play a vital role in the energy mix, particularly as a reliable source of power during times of low renewable energy generation. As energy policies evolve and the grid becomes more diversified, the future of coal plants will likely depend on their ability to adapt to new environmental standards and integrate cleaner technologies, while continuing to serve the energy demands of their surrounding communities.

More Coal plants

Spotted an error?

Our data is community-verified. If any detail looks wrong or out of date, suggest a correction below — our team reviews and applies approved changes across all languages.